News & Insights

A Tale of two electoral systems: why Reform UK could break through where the AFD couldn’t

The UK’s political landscape is at a crossroads. The two-party system, long assumed to be unbreakable, is showing cracks. If Reform UK continues to gain ground, it may not just split the right-wing vote – it could redefine it altogether. Whether it ultimately succeeds or not, one thing is clear: British politics is no longer business as usual.

LONDON – The recent German elections have once again highlighted the complexities and limitations of Europe’s political structures. Despite securing a significant share of the vote, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has been systematically excluded from government through a collective effort by mainstream parties.

In contrast, the UK’s ‘first past the post’ electoral system operates on entirely different rules, where an insurgent party can, under the right conditions, rapidly shift from the fringes to the centre of power. With Reform UK – led by Disruptor in Chief Nigel Farage – now polling at levels that suggest a serious challenge to the traditional two-party system, what lessons can be drawn from the apparent rise (and exclusion from power) of the AfD?

Inclusion vs Stability

Across Germany and most of Europe, proportional representation (PR) ensures that smaller parties gain some parliamentary representation, reflecting a broader spectrum of voter preferences. Whilst this may seem more democratic in principle, it has also resulted in increasingly fragmented and fragile governments. 

Germany’s complex coalition negotiations and the repeated struggles to form stable administrations highlight the inherent risks of a system where no single party can govern alone. In The Netherlands, far-right election winner Geert Wilders governs in coalition with three other parties having been blocked from becoming the country’s Prime Minister.

The UK’s electoral system has largely avoided this issue by forcing elections into a binary choice between Labour and the Conservatives. This has created a formidable barrier to the rise of new parties, despite numerous attempts over the past 70 years. From the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 1980s to UKIP’s surge in the 2010s, the system has consistently ensured that challengers struggle to convert national vote share into parliamentary seats.

However, FPTP’s stability has a paradoxical feature: whilst it suppresses minor parties, it also allows for the possibility of a dramatic breakthrough. If an insurgent party can position itself as the primary alternative to one of the established parties, it can rapidly move from the fringes to the mainstream. This is precisely what we are beginning to see with Reform UK.

Reform’s Rise

For the first time since Labour’s emergence in the early 20th century, a new party is polling at levels that suggest it could disrupt the traditional duopoly. Recent national polling places Reform UK neck and neck with (and often ahead of) both Labour and the Conservatives, making it the primary alternative in an increasing number of parliamentary constituencies. If an election were held tomorrow, Reform could potentially win the most seats – a seismic shift in British politics.

Of course, elections are not held in polling booths tomorrow, and voter sentiment could shift when faced with a real decision. But what is undeniable is that Reform UK is no longer a mere protest vote. Unlike previous insurgencies, it is demonstrating a level of staying power and regional consolidation, particularly in the Midlands and North – historically Labour strongholds that have seen significant shifts in political loyalty over the past decade.

 

A New Central Political Question

One of the most effective ways to break the traditional two-party system is by introducing a new, central political question that transcends the usual left-right divide. The main differences between Labour and the Conservatives have historically revolved around economic policy, social issues, and public services. However, when a party can introduce an entirely new axis of political debate – such as immigration, sovereignty, or national identity – it has the potential to reshape the political landscape.

This is precisely what Reform UK appears to be attempting. By focusing on issues that neither of the main parties have fully addressed, the party is positioning itself not just as an alternative to the Conservatives, but as a force capable of reframing the entire political debate.
If Reform succeeds in making immigration or governance reform the defining issue of the next election, it stands a realistic chance of breaking the two-party hold on power and securing enough seats to significantly influence or even shape the next government.

From Ideology to Administration?

The fundamental choice that once defined British elections – Labour (workers) versus Conservatives (capital / markets) – has become increasingly blurred. Today, the choice between the two main parties is less ideological and more about who is perceived as the more competent administrator. As traditional party identities somewhat erode, voters are looking elsewhere, and Reform’s rise suggests a significant proportion of them may have found an alternative.

This dynamic puts both Labour and the Conservatives in an unprecedented dilemma. Unlike in Germany, where mainstream parties have successfully excluded radical challengers like the AfD from government, the UK’s two-party structure means that any serious alternative has the potential to replace one of the incumbents outright. If Reform UK maintains its momentum, it could force a realignment that reshapes British politics – and its two dominant parties – for decades to come.

Reform’s Biggest Test Yet

Labour has signalled that it intends to see out a full parliamentary term, meaning the next general election won’t take place until 2029. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity for Reform UK. Holding onto momentum for another four years will be a monumental task, and historical precedent suggests that a struggling Conservative Party may replace its leader before the next election – just as Boris Johnson’s rise in 2019 effectively neutralised the Brexit Party’s momentum.

Reform’s close association with figures including Donald Trump could also prove to be a liability with a British electorate that has traditionally viewed American-style populism with scepticism. Can we realistically expect Nigel Farage – and the likes of Lee Anderson – to avoid fatal banana skins or own-goals for a full four years?

Recognising this challenge, Farage made visible efforts to professionalise Reform’s operations. This includes distancing himself from more controversial figures and narratives that could alienate mainstream voters. The most notable example is the party’s decision to step back from Elon Musk’s comments about Tommy Robinson – a move that signals an awareness of the need to build credibility beyond its core base. Whether this rebranding effort will succeed remains to be seen, but it suggests Reform is learning the lessons from past insurgent movements that failed to make the leap from populist protest to become a serious political contender.

A Political Inflection Point

The UK’s political landscape is at a crossroads. The two-party system, long assumed to be unbreakable, is showing cracks. If Reform UK continues to gain ground, it may not just split the right-wing vote – it could redefine it altogether. Whether it ultimately succeeds or not, one thing is clear: British politics is no longer business as usual.

For businesses and corporate clients monitoring political trends, understanding these dynamics is critical. In Germany, the AfD’s rise reflects deeper societal shifts that are likely to influence parliamentary policy debates and economic decisions of the new government. In the UK – in the week that the centre-left Labour government raised eyebrows by cutting foreign aid to fund increases in defence spending – Reform’s growing influence could reshape the Conservative Party, and wider British politics as a whole.

As Europe’s political landscape continues to shift, keeping a close eye on these movements will be essential for those navigating uncertainty in the corporate world.

Contact

Stephen Kelly, Director at BOLDT BPI: [email protected]